Pierce v. State
591 So. 2d 928, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 41, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 46, 1992 WL 2016
Opinion
We have for review Pierce v. State, 583 So.2d 1095, 1095 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), in which the Fifth District Court of Appeal certified the following question of great public importance:
DO FLORIDA’S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES REQUIRE THAT LEGAL CONSTRAINT POINTS BE ASSESSED FOR EACH OFFENSE COMMITTED WHILE UNDER LEGAL CONSTRAINT?
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. In Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991), we answered this same question in the negative. Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand this case for reconsideration consistent with our opinion in Flowers.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. State, 591 So. 2d 928, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 41, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 46, 1992 WL 2016 (Fla. 1992).
591 So. 2d 928 (Pierce v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flowers v. State
586 So. 2d 1058 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Pierce v. State
583 So. 2d 1095 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)