Pierce v. State

851 So. 2d 618, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 161, 2000 WL 1603791
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 27, 2000
DocketCR-96-1668
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 851 So. 2d 618 (Pierce v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. State, 851 So. 2d 618, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 161, 2000 WL 1603791 (Ala. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

BASCHAB, Judge.

On the authority of Ex parte Pierce, 851 So.2d 606 (Ala.2000), we remand this case to the circuit court for proceedings consistent with the Alabama Supreme Court’s opinion. Specifically, the circuit court shall conduct “an evidentiary hearing on the question whether Pierce’s claim could have been raised at trial or on appeal and is thus barred pursuant to Rule 32.2(a)(3) or (a)(5).” Pierce, 851 So.2d at 617. The circuit court shall take all necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time and within 60 days after the release of this opinion. The return to remand shall include a transcript of the evidentiary hearing and the circuit court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

LONG, P.J., and MeMILLAN, COBB, and FRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferguson v. State
13 So. 3d 418 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2008)
Harris v. State
947 So. 2d 1079 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
851 So. 2d 618, 2000 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 161, 2000 WL 1603791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-state-alacrimapp-2000.