Pierce v. Smith

102 S.E. 648, 25 Ga. App. 101, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 621
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 18, 1920·No. 11153·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

In a contest as to' the selection of an administrator, where the decedent left no children, but left several sisters and the children of two deceased brothers as his heirs at law, the children of a deceased brother would together have one vote in the selection of the administrator. See Civil Code (1910), §§ 3931, 3943, subsections 2 and 3; Mattox v. Embry, 131 Ga. 283, 287 (62 S. E. 202).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. H. F. Lawson, for plaintiffs in error. H. E. Coates, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Smith, 102 S.E. 648, 25 Ga. App. 101, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

102 S.E. 648 (Pierce v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brannen v. Boyce
378 S.E.2d 743 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Rowe v. Walker
148 S.E. 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)