Home/Supreme Court/Pierce v. Pierce

Pierce v. Pierce

455 U.S. 1010, 102 S. Ct. 1700
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 22, 1982
DocketNo. 76-1234; No. 76-1261
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 455 U.S. 1010 (Pierce v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. Pierce, 455 U.S. 1010, 102 S. Ct. 1700 (1982).

Opinion

C. A. 4th Cir.; and

C. A. 9th Cir. Upon consideration of the motion to vacate filed by the Solicitor General on March 11, 1982, the judgments of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Maryland and the United States District Court for the Central District of California, respectively, with directions to dismiss the causes as moot when the parties jointly so move. Reported below: No. 76-1234, 544 F. 2d 514; No. 76-1261, 547 F. 2d 1062.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Underwood
487 U.S. 552 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Little Earth of United Tribes, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
675 F. Supp. 497 (D. Minnesota, 1987)
Dubose v. Pierce
761 F.2d 913 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Vernice Dubose, Susan Daigle, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Windham Heights Associates, a Limited Partnership Anthony Associates, a General Partnership and Simon Konover, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a General Partner in Windham Heights Associates and Anthony Associates, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant- Cross-Appellee. Claudia Walter and Dominick Cortese, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Carabetta Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Connecticut, Located in the Town of Meriden, County of New Haven, State of Connecticut, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant- Cross-Appellee. Janette Little, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Richard Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Part-Owner of East Hartford Estates Oak Management Co., Inc., a Connecticut Corporation Louis Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Part-Owner of East Hartford Estates, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant- Cross-Appellee. May Pleasant, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Tuscan Brotherhood Homes, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Pantaleon Morales, Ylda Ladson and Margaret Williams, Individually and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development William H. Hernandez, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Manager for Connecticut for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Canterbury Gardens Cooperative, Inc. And Ripps Realty, Inc., Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development William H. Hernandez, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Manager for Connecticut for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants-Appellants-Cross- Cathy Adams, Sheila Caqette, Barbara Littlejohn and Hazel French, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Branford Manor Associates, Bay Management Corporation, Marvin S. Gold, Annette E.P. Gold, Milton A. Bernblum, John J. Groves, and Burton Levy, Individually and as General Partners in Branford Manor Associates, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant- Cross-Appellee. Merry Ellen Grundman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development John Errichett, Individually and in His Capacity as Owner of Highwood Apartments Creative Management & Realty, a Connecticut Corporation, Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendant-Appellant-Cross- Joann Johnson and Frank Jackson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc., San Fernando Valley Neighborhood Legal Services, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development William H. Hernandez, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Manager for Connecticut for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and Ripps Realty, Inc., Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development William H. Hernandez, Jr., Individually and in His Capacity as Manager for Connecticut for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Defendants-Appellants-Cross
761 F.2d 913 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Beck Park Apartments v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
695 F.2d 366 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)
Beck Park Apartments v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban Development
695 F.2d 366 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 U.S. 1010, 102 S. Ct. 1700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-pierce-scotus-1982.