Pierce v. Pierce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pierce v. Pierce

291 A.D.2d 251, 736 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1401

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 251 (Pierce v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. Pierce, 291 A.D.2d 251, 736 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered October 9, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, determined that all issues of fault and equitable distribution were deemed resolved by a prior Family Court order entered on or about May 16, 2001, to the effect that there was no valid marriage between the parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, who sought, inter alia, visitation with, and/or custody of, his and defendant’s yet unborn cMld in a matrimonial action brought in Supreme Court, New York County, was barred under the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata from relitigating the issue of whether he and defendant had been validly married, the issue having been previously determined by Family Court, Bronx County, in a separate proceeding brought by plaintiff against defendant in which he sought, inter alia, to compel defendant to undergo a mental health examination and evaluation (see, Casson v Casson, 107 AD2d 342, appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 637; and see, Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295). We note that in Family Court, plaintiff conceded there was no valid civil certificate of marriage. Concur — Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered October 9, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, determined that all issues of fault and equitable distribution were deemed resolved by a prior Family Court order entered on or about May 16, 2001, to the effect that there was no valid marriage between the parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, who sought, inter alia, visitation with, and/or custody of, his and defendant’s yet unborn cMld in a matrimonial action brought in Supreme Court, New York County, was barred under the doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata from relitigating the issue of whether he and defendant had been validly married, the issue having been previously determined by Family Court, Bronx County, in a separate proceeding brought by plaintiff against defendant in which he sought, inter alia, to compel defendant to undergo a mental health examination and evaluation (see, Casson v Casson, 107 AD2d 342, appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 637; and see, Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295). We note that in Family Court, plaintiff conceded there was no valid civil certificate of marriage. Concur — Williams, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 251, 736 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-pierce-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack