Pierce v. Pierce

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pierce v. Pierce

263 So. 3d 253

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 25, 2019

DocketNo. 1D17-1824

StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 3d 253 (Pierce v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. Pierce, 263 So. 3d 253 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Michael Eric Pierce, challenges the trial court's Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We reject his claims except his argument that the trial court failed to make the requisite factual determinations justifying the amount of child support awarded, as well as any arrears. Accordingly, we reverse and remand so that the trial court can make the appropriate factual findings relating to the trial court's calculation of the child support and arrears owed by Pierce. See Exter v. Diodonet-Molina , 152 So.3d 699, 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; Aguirre v. Aguirre , 985 So.2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED .

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Michael Eric Pierce, challenges the trial court's Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. We reject his claims except his argument that the trial court failed to make the requisite factual determinations justifying the amount of child support awarded, as well as any arrears. Accordingly, we reverse and remand so that the trial court can make the appropriate factual findings relating to the trial court's calculation of the child support and arrears owed by Pierce. See Exter v. Diodonet-Molina , 152 So.3d 699, 701 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; Aguirre v. Aguirre , 985 So.2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED .

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 So. 3d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-pierce-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack