Pierce v. Moreland

1923 OK 60, 212 P. 429, 88 Okla. 176, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 579
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 30, 1923
Docket13872
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1923 OK 60 (Pierce v. Moreland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. Moreland, 1923 OK 60, 212 P. 429, 88 Okla. 176, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 579 (Okla. 1923).

Opinion

MeNEILL, J.

Defendant in error filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. No response has been filed to said motion.

On the 29th day of May, 1922, the court overruled a motion for new trial and granted time for making and serving case-made. The time was extended from time to time, and expired on the 27th day of September, 1922. Case-made was served on the 5th day of October, 1922, and not within any valid extension of time granted by the judge.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

JOHNSON, V. C. J., and KENNAMER, NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, BRANSON, and HARRISON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Inter-City Finance Corp. v. Hooker
1934 OK 265 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Bailey v. Evans
1924 OK 689 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1923 OK 60, 212 P. 429, 88 Okla. 176, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-moreland-okla-1923.