Pierce v. Marc

826 So. 2d 525, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2002 WL 31114768
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2002·No. No. 3D02-822·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Robert Pierce appeals an adverse order granting defendant Kenneth Marc’s motion for relief from default judgment. We reverse.

The trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment because the motion was unsworn, failed to allege either excusable neglect or a meritorious defense, and failed to provide any basis for relief under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 1.540. See Lederman v. Shore, 707 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Florida Specialized Carriers, Inc. v. Tierra Constr. Co. Inc., 632 So.2d 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Perry v. University Cabs, Inc., 344 So.2d 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Accordingly, the order granting relief from the default judgment is reversed, and the trial court is instructed on remand to reinstate the final judgment.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Marc, 826 So. 2d 525, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13931, 2002 WL 31114768 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

826 So. 2d 525 (Pierce v. Marc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. University Cabs, Inc.
344 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Lederman v. Shore
707 So. 2d 1134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Florida Specialized Carriers, Inc. v. Tierra Construction Co.
632 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)