Pierce v. Kusic

56 Vt. 418
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided October 15, 1883·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rowell, J.

The Homestead Act provides that “ the homestead of a housekeeper or head of a family, consisting of a dwelling-house, out-buildings, and the land used in connection therewith, not exceeding five hundred dollars in value, and used [420]*420or kept by suck housekeeper or head of a family as a homestead, shall * * * be exempt from attachment and execution, except,” etc. R. L.-s. 1894.

Perry Marsh was a housekeeper, and used the demanded premises as a homestead, which in character and value fulfilled all the requirements of the statute, and the case comes not within its exception.

Therefore said premises were exempt from attachment and execution.

• Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Kusic, 56 Vt. 418 (Vt. 1883).

56 Vt. 418 (Pierce v. Kusic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re D'Avignon
34 B.R. 790 (D. Vermont, 1981)
Weaver v. First National Bank
94 P. 273 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1907)
Martin v. Harrington
50 A. 1074 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1901)
Hyser v. Mansfield
47 A. 105 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1899)