Pierce v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
186 So. 2d 160, 249 La. 201, 1966 La. LEXIS 2348
Opinion
In re: Esco Pierce and Mrs. Ophelia Pierce applying for certiorari, writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 184 So.2d 241.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 186 So. 2d 160, 249 La. 201, 1966 La. LEXIS 2348 (La. 1966).
186 So. 2d 160 (Pierce v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gordon v. Southern United Fire Ins. Co.
679 So. 2d 582 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Collins v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
402 So. 2d 158 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)
LeBoyd v. Louisiana Transit Co.
375 So. 2d 749 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)