Pierce v. Gray
This text of Pierce v. Gray (Pierce v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROBERT PIERCE, ) Plaintiff, No. CIV-25-662-R STEPHEN GRAY, and DOES 1-10, ) Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 7]. During the pendency of the motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 8]. This Amended Complaint supersedes Plaintiff’s original pleading and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is therefore DENIED as moot, without prejudice to resubmission, 1f appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1* day of August, 2025.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pierce v. Gray, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-gray-okwd-2025.