Pierce v. Gilkey

124 Mass. 300, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 299
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 13, 1878·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Gbay, O. J.

It is unnecessary to consider whether the composition between Gilkey and his creditors covered his partnership as well as his individual debts, because, even if it did, yet, the amount of the composition not having been paid or tendered to the plaintiff, and he not having waived such payment or tender, nor taken any part in the proceedings for a composition, he was not barred of his action. Edwards v. Coombe, L. R. 7 C. P. 519. In re Hatton, L. R. 7 Ch. 723. Ex parte Peacock, L. R. 8 Ch. 682. Goldney v. Lording, L. R. 8 Q. B. 182. Newell v. Van Praagh, L. R. 9 C. P. 96. National Mount Wollaston Bank v. Porter, 122 Mass. 308. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Gilkey, 124 Mass. 300, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 299 (Mass. 1878).

124 Mass. 300 (Pierce v. Gilkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W. L. Blake Co. v. Lowell
34 A. 264 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1896)
Pupke v. Churchill
16 Mo. App. 334 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
Whittemore v. Stephens
12 N.W. 858 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1882)
Home National Bank v. Carpenter
129 Mass. 1 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
Farwell v. Raddin
129 Mass. 7 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)
In re Bayly
2 F. Cas. 1085 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana, 1879)