Pierce v. Gaskins

282 S.E.2d 776, 158 Ga. App. 864, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2449
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 17, 1981
Docket62178
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 282 S.E.2d 776 (Pierce v. Gaskins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. Gaskins, 282 S.E.2d 776, 158 Ga. App. 864, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2449 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

This appeal is from the grant of a motion for new trial, which is not final and thus not a directly appealable judgment under Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072,1073; 1975, pp. 757, 758; 1979, pp. 619, 620). Because the procedures for interlocutory appeal have not been followed, the appeal must accordingly be dismissed. See Gordon v. Gordon, 236 Ga. 99 (222 SE2d 381) (1976).

Appeal dismissed.

Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Gaskins
309 S.E.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 S.E.2d 776, 158 Ga. App. 864, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-gaskins-gactapp-1981.