Pierce v. Frederick

Fourth Circuit

Pierce v. Frederick

42 F. App'x 656

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 20, 2002·No. No. 02-6506·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry P. Pierce seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pierce v. Frederick, No. CA-01-2004-0-23-BD (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Larry P. Pierce seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pierce v. Frederick, No. CA-01-2004-0-23-BD (D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Pierce v. Frederick, 42 F. App'x 656 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 656 (Pierce v. Frederick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related