Pierce v. Frederick

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 20, 2002
Docket02-6506
StatusUnpublished

This text of Pierce v. Frederick (Pierce v. Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. Frederick, (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6506

LARRY P. PIERCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DODGE FREDERICK, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-2004-0-23-BD)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry P. Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry P. Pierce seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Pierce v. Frederick, No. CA-01-2004-0-23-BD

(D.S.C. Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pierce v. Frederick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-frederick-ca4-2002.