Pierce v. Four Seasons Solar Products Corp.
895 S.W.2d 635, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 535
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s decision granting Defendant’s Motion for Directed Verdict after both sides’ opening statements. We affirm.
We find no error of law appears, and an opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b)(5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. Four Seasons Solar Products Corp., 895 S.W.2d 635, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 535 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
895 S.W.2d 635 (Pierce v. Four Seasons Solar Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.