Pierce v. Felter

53 Cal. 18
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1878·No. No. 5989·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The only question presented in this case is whether the owner of an estate or interest in land, less than an estate in fee, can maintain an action for the determination of an adverse claim made by another person. We think that he can. The Code of Civil Procedure (sec. 738) provides, in terms, that an action may be brought by any person against another who claims an estate or interest in real property adverse to him, for the purpose of determining such adverse claim.

We are unable to see any reason why the benefit of this statute, remedial in its character, should be confined to estates in fee, when the words employed by the Legislature embrace every interest or estate in lands of which the law takes cognizance.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Felter, 53 Cal. 18 (Cal. 1878).

53 Cal. 18 (Pierce v. Felter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valencia v. VF Outdoor, LLC
E.D. California, 2022
Schipper v. Penkalski
115 P.2d 231 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Langstaff v. Mitchell
6 P.2d 546 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Berry v. Howard
127 N.W. 526 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1910)
German-American Sav. Bank v. Gollmer
102 P. 932 (California Supreme Court, 1909)
Smith Oyster Co. v. Darbee & Immel Oyster & Land Co.
149 F. 555 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1906)
Battelle v. Wolven
102 N.W. 297 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
Shields v. Johnson
79 P. 391 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)
Pollock Mining & Milling Co. v. Davenport
78 P. 768 (Montana Supreme Court, 1904)
Johnson v. Hurst
77 P. 784 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1904)
Blakemore v. Roberts
96 N.W. 1029 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1903)
Rincon Water & Power Co. v. Anaheim Union Water Co.
115 F. 543 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1902)
Stephenson v. Deuel
58 P. 258 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Pennie v. Hildreth
22 P. 398 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Wisconsin River Land Co.
36 N.W. 837 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)
McKinnie v. Shaffer
16 P. 509 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Mora v. Le Roy
58 Cal. 8 (California Supreme Court, 1881)