Pierce v. Dahlgren

Supreme Court

Pierce v. Dahlgren

256 U.S. 682, 41 S. Ct. 534

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 18, 1921

DocketNo. 800

StatusPublished

This text of 256 U.S. 682 (Pierce v. Dahlgren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pierce v. Dahlgren, 256 U.S. 682, 41 S. Ct. 534 (1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 302; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444. Mr. J. Warren Keifer for appellant and petitioner. Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Mr. Frederic R. Coudert and Mr- Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee and respondent. [Certiorari denied, see post, 692.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300, 302; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444. Mr. J. Warren Keifer for appellant and petitioner. Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Mr. Frederic R. Coudert and Mr- Howard Thayer Kingsbury for appellee and respondent. [Certiorari denied, see post, 692.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 U.S. 682, 41 S. Ct. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-dahlgren-scotus-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack