Pierce v. Clark

1 Tyl. 140
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided June 15, 1801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Sed per Curiam.

The statute provision does not abolish the common law privilege. The defendant may shew under this issue any thing which goes to the discharge of the note, Payment is always good shewing. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pierce v. Clark, 1 Tyl. 140 (Vt. 1801).

1 Tyl. 140 (Pierce v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worthen v. Dickey
54 Vt. 277 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1881)