Pierce v. City of New Bedford
129 Mass. 534, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 291
Opinion
The declaration shows no cause of action against the defendant. A boy coasting upon a hand-sled is not a defect or want of repair in the highway, for which the city is liable to a person struck by the moving sled. St. 1877, c. 234. Vinal v. Dorchester, 7 Gray, 421. Shepherd v. Chelsea, 4 Allen, 113. Barber v. Roxbury, 11 Allen, 318. Hutchinson v. Concord, 41 Vt. 271. Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pierce v. City of New Bedford, 129 Mass. 534, 1880 Mass. LEXIS 291 (Mass. 1880).
129 Mass. 534 (Pierce v. City of New Bedford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caissie v. City of Cambridge
58 N.E.2d 169 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)
Harris v. City of Des Moines
209 N.W. 454 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
Delamaine v. Inhabitants of Revere
118 N.E. 660 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Custer v. City of New Philadelphia
20 Ohio C.C. 177 (Tuscarawas Circuit Court, 1900)
Custer v. New Philadelphia
11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 9 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1900)
Jones v. City of Williamsburg
47 L.R.A. 294 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1900)
Howard v. City of Brooklyn
30 A.D. 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Toomey v. City of Albany
14 N.Y.S. 572 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
Hubbell v. City of Viroqua
30 N.W. 847 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1886)
Burford v. City of Grand Rapids
18 N.W. 571 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)