Pierce v. Brinkman

849 So. 2d 433, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10630, 2003 WL 21634427
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 14, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-5255
StatusPublished

This text of 849 So. 2d 433 (Pierce v. Brinkman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce v. Brinkman, 849 So. 2d 433, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10630, 2003 WL 21634427 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of May 28, 2003, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The order on appeal, which reopened the case file following a nonfinal order dismissing appellant’s complaint without prejudice, did not end the judicial labor in the case nor bring a termination of the cause as between the parties. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974); Augustin v. Blount, Inc., 573 So.2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

ERVIN, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Augustin v. Blount, Inc.
573 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
SLT Warehouse Company v. Webb
304 So. 2d 97 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
849 So. 2d 433, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10630, 2003 WL 21634427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-v-brinkman-fladistctapp-2003.