Pierce v. Bergamine

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6225

LARRY ONEAL PIERCE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TOM BERGAMINE; W.C. DEW; RITA COX,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03060-D)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Oneal Pierce, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Oneal Pierce appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pierce v.

Bergamine, No. 5:10-ct-03060-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2011). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED