Pierce Trading Co. v. City of Blackshear

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pierce Trading Co. v. City of Blackshear

186 S.E. 721, 182 Ga. 649, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 528

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 2, 1936·No. No. 11230·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

1. "He who would have equity must do equity,.- and give effect to all equitable rights of the other party respecting the subject-matter of the suit.” Code of 1933, § 37-104. "One seeking relief from excessive tax levies, but admitting, either expressly or by necessary implication, that he owes part of the tax covered .by such executions, must pay or offer to pay the amount of the taxes admitted to be due, in order to obtain the relief sought.” Peoples Credit Clothing Co. v. Atlanta, 173 Ga. 653 (168 S. E. 73); Candler v. Gilbert, 180 Ga. 679 (180 S. E. 723), and cit.

(а) On its facts the instant case is controlled by the above-quoted ruling which was concurred in by all the Justices and is binding as a precedent.

(б) The decision in City of Macon v. Ries, 179 Ga. 320 (4) (176 S. E. 21), which was not concurred in by all the Justices, overlooked the above-quoted decision, and, if it is in conflict therewith, must yield to the older decision.

[650] No. 11230. July 2, 1936.

(o) The judge did not err in refusing an injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jitstiees concur. J. D. Blaloclc, Tom G. Blaloclc, and Memory & Memory, for plaintiff. 8. Thomas Memory and G. A. Williams, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, Justice.

1. "He who would have equity must do equity,.- and give effect to all equitable rights of the other party respecting the subject-matter of the suit.” Code of 1933, § 37-104. "One seeking relief from excessive tax levies, but admitting, either expressly or by necessary implication, that he owes part of the tax covered .by such executions, must pay or offer to pay the amount of the taxes admitted to be due, in order to obtain the relief sought.” Peoples Credit Clothing Co. v. Atlanta, 173 Ga. 653 (168 S. E. 73); Candler v. Gilbert, 180 Ga. 679 (180 S. E. 723), and cit.

(а) On its facts the instant case is controlled by the above-quoted ruling which was concurred in by all the Justices and is binding as a precedent.

(б) The decision in City of Macon v. Ries, 179 Ga. 320 (4) (176 S. E. 21), which was not concurred in by all the Justices, overlooked the above-quoted decision, and, if it is in conflict therewith, must yield to the older decision.

[650] No. 11230. July 2, 1936.

(o) The judge did not err in refusing an injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jitstiees concur. J. D. Blaloclc, Tom G. Blaloclc, and Memory & Memory, for plaintiff. 8. Thomas Memory and G. A. Williams, for defendants.

Pierce Trading Co. v. City of Blackshear, 186 S.E. 721, 182 Ga. 649, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 528 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

186 S.E. 721 (Pierce Trading Co. v. City of Blackshear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related