Pierce, Kaitlin v. White Sables, LLC

2018 TN WC 123
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedAugust 8, 2018
Docket2017-03-1398
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 TN WC 123 (Pierce, Kaitlin v. White Sables, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pierce, Kaitlin v. White Sables, LLC, 2018 TN WC 123 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2018).

Opinion

FILED Aug 08, 2018 03:42 PM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE KAITLIN PIERCE, ) Docket No. 2017-03-1398 Employee, ) v. ) State File No. 89239-2017 WHITE STABLES, LLC, ) Employer. ) Judge Lisa A. Lowe

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING BENEFITS

This matter came before the Court on Kaitlin Pierce’s Request for Expedited Hearing on August 1, 2018. The central legal issue is whether Ms. Pierce is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on entitlement to medical and temporary disability benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Pierce would likely prevail and orders White Stables to provide the requested benefits.

History of Claim

White Stables employed Ms. Pierce on October 20, 2017, as a stable hand/trainer. She testified White Stables agreed to pay her nine dollars per hour for forty hours per week. While working on October 21; Ms. Pierce fell from a horse and injured her back, right hip, and right leg. She reported her injury to White Stables. Ms. Pierce’s father took her to Sweetwater Hospital Emergency Room, where doctors diagnosed multiple leg contusions and prescribed crutches and medication. Ms. Pierce submitted the following bills into evidence: Sweetwater Hospital-$17,259.00; Sweetwater Emergency Room physician Dr. Joshua Murphy-$220.01; and Tennessee Valley Radiology-$824.00.

Ms. Pierce’s pain continued, so she sought treatment at Athens Walk-In Clinic. Her leg MRI revealed a muscle tear. The clinic provider assigned restrictions of no lifting over ten pounds, no bending or stooping, and no walking or standing longer than thirty minutes. Later, Ms. Pierce sought treatment from Dr. Nathan Trentham, who ordered physical therapy and continued her restrictions. Ultimately, she started treating with Dr. Jason Spangler.’ Ms. Pierce testified Dr. Spangler assigned restrictions of no lifting over fifteen pounds. She still treats with Dr. Spangler.

Ms. Pierce stated White Stables never offered her a position within her restrictions and she was unable to work until starting a new job at Athens Co-Op on November 26, 2017. Her job at Athens Co-Op pays the same amount she made at White Stables. Ms. Pierce asked the Court to order White Stables to pay for past and ongoing medical expenses, designate Dr. Spangler as the authorized treating physician, and pay accrued temporary disability benefits from October 21 through November 25, 2017.

White Stables called no witnesses and introduced no evidence.” It argued that the farm/agricultural exemption applies. Additionally, White Stables argued that even if it were not exempt under the agricultural exemption, it is not liable under the Equine Activity Exemption. It argued Ms. Pierce was a “participant,” which is defined as “any person, whether amateur or professional, who engages in equine activity, whether or not a fee is paid to participate in the equine activity.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Pierce need not prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence to receive relief at an expedited hearing. Instead, she must present sufficient evidence showing she would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

Exemptions

White Stables claimed exemption from providing workers’ compensation benefits under the farm/agricultural and equine activities exemptions. It asked the Court to take judicial notice of an O*NET online definition of “farmworkers, farm, ranch, and aquacutural animals.” The Court declines to take judicial notice of the definition, as it is subject to reasonable dispute and not generally known. See Tenn. R. Evid. 201(b) (2017).

'Ms. Pierce acknowledged that she did not file or introduce any of Dr. Spangler’s records or bills into evidence.

? White Stables attempted to introduce the affidavit of Pascal White into evidence. Ms. Pierce objected, and the Court sustained the objection since White Stables did not provide the affidavit ten days before the hearing as required by Mediation and Hearing Procedures 0800-02-21-.14(b). Therefore, the Court marked the affidavit for identification only. The Court notes the affidavit stated White Stables has not had more than four employees regularly employed since January 1, 2018, but Ms. Pierce’s injury occurred on October 21, 2017. White Stables also asked the Court to take judicial notice of Tennessee Code Annotated sections 50-6-106 (D)(4) and 44-20-101-105. The Court takes judicial notice that these statutes exist. However, their existence does not alleviate White Stables’ burden of establishing application to this case. White Stables failed to introduce any evidence or provide any testimony to establish applicability of either exemption.

Additionally, White Stables argued exemption from providing workers’ compensation coverage because it only had four employees. The Bureau’s Investigation Report, admitted into evidence without objection, contained the following excerpt from a December 1, 2017 interview with White Stables’ business manager, Pascal White: “Ms. White said that Ms. Pierce was hired to do barn chores such as clean stalls, clean, feed and groom horses. Ms. White confirmed she had at least five workers[.]” (Emphasis added.) The Court holds that Ms. Pierce is likely to succeed at a hearing on the merits of establishing White Stables had five or more employees at the time of her injury and does not qualify for a workers’ compensation exemption.

Injury

To receive benefits, Ms. Pierce must show she suffered an injury “caused by a specific incident, or set of incidents, arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment .. . [that] is identifiable by time and place of occurrence.” An injury “arises primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment” only if the “employment contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing the injury, considering all causes[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14). “Except in the most obvious, simple and routine cases, the claimant in a workers’ compensation action must establish by expert medical evidence the causal relationship . . . between the claimed injury (and disability) and the employment activity.” Orman v. William Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991).

Ample proof established Ms. Pierce suffered a work-related injury. Ms. Pierce provided a detailed description of the mechanism of injury and introduced medical records and bills that outlined her treatment for the injury. White Stables provided no testimony or evidence to rebut Ms. Pierce’s description of the injury or the treatment she received. The Court holds she suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment.

Medical Benefits

Turning to the requested relief, the Court holds that White Stables must pay for Ms. Pierce’s past treatment with Sweetwater Hospital, Athens Walk-In Clinic, and Drs. Trentham and Spangler. The Court further holds that White Stables must also provide continuing reasonable, necessary treatment related to her work injury. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-204(a)(1)(A). The Court appoints Dr. Spangler as the authorized treating physician. The Court finds treatment with Sweetwater Hospital, Athens Walk-In Clinic, and Drs. Trentham and Spangler appropriate because White Stables failed to provide a panel of physicians, thereby requiring Ms.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.
803 S.W.2d 672 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 TN WC 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pierce-kaitlin-v-white-sables-llc-tennworkcompcl-2018.