Pier Pavilion, Inc. v. Hensley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pier Pavilion, Inc. v. Hensley

150 So. 2d 460, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3459

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1963

DocketNo. 3409

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 So. 2d 460 (Pier Pavilion, Inc. v. Hensley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pier Pavilion, Inc. v. Hensley, 150 So. 2d 460, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3459 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, defendant below, appeals from an order granting the appellee-plain-tiff a new trial. A directed verdict had been given for the defendant but, subsequent thereto, the court decided he had erred in granting a directed verdict and granted a new trial on the theory that it was a jury question as to whether or not the defendant provided the plaintiff with sufficient safeguards for her protection when she fell from a diving platform at defendant’s swimming pool on Clearwater Beach. A previous summary judgment had been denied the defendant.

We conclude that there was no error in the court granting a new trial below.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, C. J., and ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, defendant below, appeals from an order granting the appellee-plain-tiff a new trial. A directed verdict had been given for the defendant but, subsequent thereto, the court decided he had erred in granting a directed verdict and granted a new trial on the theory that it was a jury question as to whether or not the defendant provided the plaintiff with sufficient safeguards for her protection when she fell from a diving platform at defendant’s swimming pool on Clearwater Beach. A previous summary judgment had been denied the defendant.

We conclude that there was no error in the court granting a new trial below.

Affirmed.

SHANNON, C. J., and ALLEN and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 So. 2d 460, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pier-pavilion-inc-v-hensley-fladistctapp-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack