Pieper v. Maclaren

108 N.W. 1118, 99 Minn. 513, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 477
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 27, 1906·No. Nos. 14,812—(177)·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since this ease was argued and determined by the trial court, the decision in Coffman v. London & N. W. Am. M. Co. has been filed, 98 Minn. 416, 108 N. W. 840. Under that decision, the defendant not having a deed, was not entitled to judgment establishing title. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial should therefore have been granted.

Order reversed and a hew trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pieper v. Maclaren, 108 N.W. 1118, 99 Minn. 513, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 477 (Mich. 1906).

108 N.W. 1118 (Pieper v. Maclaren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coffman v. London & Northwest American Mortgage Co.
108 N.W. 840 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)