Pieper v. Maclaren
108 N.W. 1118, 99 Minn. 513, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 477
This text of 108 N.W. 1118 (Pieper v. Maclaren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pieper v. Maclaren, 108 N.W. 1118, 99 Minn. 513, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 477 (Mich. 1906).
Opinion
Since this ease was argued and determined by the trial court, the decision in Coffman v. London & N. W. Am. M. Co. has been filed, 98 Minn. 416, 108 N. W. 840. Under that decision, the defendant not having a deed, was not entitled to judgment establishing title. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial should therefore have been granted.
Order reversed and a hew trial granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Coffman v. London & Northwest American Mortgage Co.
108 N.W. 840 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
108 N.W. 1118, 99 Minn. 513, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pieper-v-maclaren-minn-1906.