PIEPER, STEVEN, PEOPLE v

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 2013·No. KA 12-00156·Published

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

273 KA 12-00156 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STEVEN M. PIEPER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered March 8, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). We agree with defendant that the purported waiver of the right to appeal is not valid inasmuch as County Court failed to obtain a knowing and voluntary waiver of that right at the time of the plea, and instead obtained the purported waiver at sentencing (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). In any event, we conclude that the sentence, which was imposed in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: March 15, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PIEPER, STEVEN, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

PIEPER, STEVEN, PEOPLE v (PIEPER, STEVEN, PEOPLE v) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)