Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co.

238 A.D. 764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 764 (Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Piedmont Hotel Co. v. A. E. Nettleton Co., 238 A.D. 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal upon the ground that clause “ C ” of the contract when read in connection with paragraphs 17 and 18, provides for an assignment of the contract without provision for a release from liability of the lessee-defendant. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to serve an amended answer within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal upon the ground that clause “ C ” of the contract when read in connection with paragraphs 17 and 18, provides for an assignment of the contract without provision for a release from liability of the lessee-defendant. All concur, except Thompson, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/piedmont-hotel-co-v-a-e-nettleton-co-nyappdiv-1933.