Pidgeon v. Littlegeorge

Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court

Pidgeon v. Littlegeorge

2 Am. Tribal Law 247

Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court·Decided April 19, 1999·No. No. CV 99-11·Published

Opinion

DISMISSAL

MARK BUTTERFIELD, Chief Judge.

Appearances: Callen Pidgeon did not appear or show cause why he did not appear, Steve Littlegeorge appeared pro se (defending himself). A Hearing in this case was held on March 17, 1999 at the Ho-Chunk Nation Court House at Black River Falls, WI. Pursuant to that hearing, the Court entered an Order (Show Cause ) to Mr. Pidgeon giving him a full and fair opportunity to explain why he did not appear at the hearing on March 17, 1999. If Mr. Pidgeon failed to explain his absence from the first hearing in this case, it would be dismissed.

[248] Mr. Pidgeon did not try to explain his absence. Therefore, this case is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISMISSAL

MARK BUTTERFIELD, Chief Judge.

Appearances: Callen Pidgeon did not appear or show cause why he did not appear, Steve Littlegeorge appeared pro se (defending himself). A Hearing in this case was held on March 17, 1999 at the Ho-Chunk Nation Court House at Black River Falls, WI. Pursuant to that hearing, the Court entered an Order (Show Cause ) to Mr. Pidgeon giving him a full and fair opportunity to explain why he did not appear at the hearing on March 17, 1999. If Mr. Pidgeon failed to explain his absence from the first hearing in this case, it would be dismissed.

[248] Mr. Pidgeon did not try to explain his absence. Therefore, this case is dismissed.

Pidgeon v. Littlegeorge, 2 Am. Tribal Law 247 (hochunkct 1999).

Pincite

2 Am. Tribal Law 247 (Pidgeon v. Littlegeorge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.