Pidgeon v. Littlegeorge
This text of 2 Am. Tribal Law 247 (Pidgeon v. Littlegeorge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ho-Chunk Nation Trial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISSAL
Appearances: Callen Pidgeon did not appear or show cause why he did not appear, Steve Littlegeorge appeared pro se (defending himself). A Hearing in this case was held on March 17, 1999 at the Ho-Chunk Nation Court House at Black River Falls, WI. Pursuant to that hearing, the Court entered an Order (Show Cause ) to Mr. Pidgeon giving him a full and fair opportunity to explain why he did not appear at the hearing on March 17, 1999. If Mr. Pidgeon failed to explain his absence from the first hearing in this case, it would be dismissed.
[248]*248Mr. Pidgeon did not try to explain his absence. Therefore, this case is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Am. Tribal Law 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pidgeon-v-littlegeorge-hochunkct-1999.