Picture Patents, LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc.
This text of Picture Patents, LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc. (Picture Patents, LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PICTURE PATENTS, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
and
INTELLINET, INC., Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
v.
AEROPOSTALE, INC., DICK’S SPORTING GOODS, INC., MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P., MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC., NBA MEDIA VENTURES, LLC, NBA PROPERTIES, INC., NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, and THE CHARLOTTE RUSSE, INC., Defendants-Appellees,
GSI COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC. and GSI COMMERCE, INC., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees,
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee. ____________________
2011-1558 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 07-CV-5567, Judge John G. Koeltl. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
THOMAS J. PARKER, Alston & Bird, of New York, New York argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant- appellant Picture Patents, LLC. and counterclaim defendant-appellant Intellinet, Inc. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. CONNOR and DAVID M. ALBAN, of Charlotte, North Carolina.
NATHAN K. CUMMINGS, Cooley LLP, of Reston Virginia, argued for defendants-appellees Aeropostale, Inc, et al and defendants/counterclaimants-appellees GSI Commerce, et al. With him on the brief were LORI MASON; and JANET L. CULLUM, of New York, New York
MARK J. ABATE, Godwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee International Business Machines Corporation. With him on the brief were CALVIN E. WINGFIELD, JR.; and WILLIAM F. SHEEHAN, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, MAYER, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Picture Patents, LLC v. Aeropostale, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/picture-patents-llc-v-aeropostale-inc-cafc-2012.