Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik

155 S.E. 383, 42 Ga. App. 176, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 281

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1930

Docket20673

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 383 (Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pictorial Review Co. v. Coolik, 155 S.E. 383, 42 Ga. App. 176, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 281 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The motion for a new trial is based upon the general grounds only. The jury settled the disputed questions of fact in favor of the defendant. The judge who presided approved the verdict, and this court is without power to reverse the ruling of the trial judge refusing a new trial.

2. The request of the defendant in error that damages be awarded him for bringing the ease to this court for delay is denied.

Judgment affii-med.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. The motion for a new trial is based upon the general grounds only. The jury settled the disputed questions of fact in favor of the defendant. The judge who presided approved the verdict, and this court is without power to reverse the ruling of the trial judge refusing a new trial.

2. The request of the defendant in error that damages be awarded him for bringing the ease to this court for delay is denied.

Judgment affii-med.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 383, 42 Ga. App. 176, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pictorial-review-co-v-coolik-gactapp-1930.