Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc.

180 S.E. 526, 51 Ga. App. 358, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 695
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 24, 1935·No. 24548·Published

Opinions

Bkoyles, O. J.

On. an agreed statement of facts tliis case was tried by a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, sitting without a jury. The controlling question was whether there was an implied promise by the defendant to pay for the goods received by it from the plaintiff; and there was sufficient evidence in the agreed statement of facts to resolve that issue in favor of the defendant, and the judge did not err in rep[359] dering judgment in its favor, nor subsequently in refusing to grant a new trial.

Decided May 24, 1935. Rehearing denied June 21, 1935. Ralph R. Quillian, Rvins & Calhoun, for plaintiff. J ones, Powers & Williams, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs. Guerry, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc., 180 S.E. 526, 51 Ga. App. 358, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

180 S.E. 526 (Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheppard v. Lang
50 S.E. 371 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Cary v. Simpson & Harper
82 S.E. 918 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Stern v. Howell
127 S.E. 775 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)