Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc.

180 S.E. 526, 51 Ga. App. 358, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 695

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 24, 1935

Docket24548

StatusPublished

This text of 180 S.E. 526 (Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pictorial Paper Package Corp. v. Lane Drug Stores Inc., 180 S.E. 526, 51 Ga. App. 358, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 695 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinions

Bkoyles, O. J.

On. an agreed statement of facts tliis case was tried by a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, sitting without a jury. The controlling question was whether there was an implied promise by the defendant to pay for the goods received by it from the plaintiff; and there was sufficient evidence in the agreed statement of facts to resolve that issue in favor of the defendant, and the judge did not err in rep[359]*359dering judgment in its favor, nor subsequently in refusing to grant a new trial.

Decided May 24, 1935. Rehearing denied June 21, 1935. Ralph R. Quillian, Rvins & Calhoun, for plaintiff. J ones, Powers & Williams, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs. Guerry, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bkoyles, O. J.

On. an agreed statement of facts tliis case was tried by a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, sitting without a jury. The controlling question was whether there was an implied promise by the defendant to pay for the goods received by it from the plaintiff; and there was sufficient evidence in the agreed statement of facts to resolve that issue in favor of the defendant, and the judge did not err in rep[359]*359dering judgment in its favor, nor subsequently in refusing to grant a new trial.

Decided May 24, 1935. Rehearing denied June 21, 1935. Ralph R. Quillian, Rvins & Calhoun, for plaintiff. J ones, Powers & Williams, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, J., concurs. Guerry, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.E. 526, 51 Ga. App. 358, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pictorial-paper-package-corp-v-lane-drug-stores-inc-gactapp-1935.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack