Pictet Artificial Ice Co. v. New York Ice Machine Co.
12 F. 816, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2591
This text of 12 F. 816 (Pictet Artificial Ice Co. v. New York Ice Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pictet Artificial Ice Co. v. New York Ice Machine Co., 12 F. 816, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2591 (circtsdny 1882).
Opinion
The consent and order for a discontinuance are, in effect, a dismissal of the bill. The complainant has the right to dismiss, with costs to the defendant, at the present stage of the case, as of course.-- -I suggest, however, that a formal rule “dismissing” the bill be entered by complainant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 F. 816, 1882 U.S. App. LEXIS 2591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pictet-artificial-ice-co-v-new-york-ice-machine-co-circtsdny-1882.