Picon v. Ryon

671 P.2d 1133, 99 Nev. 801, 1983 Nev. LEXIS 544
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 14, 1983·No. No. 14516·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint as a discovery sanction. Appellant contends that the sanction of dismissal is available only where a party willfully fails to comply with discovery orders. Consequently, appellant contends that the lower court erred in dismissing her complaint [802]*802where the lower court made no finding that appellant’s failure to provide discovery was willful.

The lower court found that appellant’s failure to provide discovery information was unexplained and unwarranted. Appellant’s unresponsive conduct halted the normal adversarial process. Appellant did not establish that her failure to provide discovery was accidental or involuntary. In such circumstances appellant’s conduct was sufficiently willful so as to warrant the sanction of dismissal. See Skeen v. Valley Bank of Nevada, 89 Nev. 301, 511 P.2d 1053 (1973); U.S. Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. D & H Dist. Co. 279 A.2d 511 (D.C. 1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Picon v. Ryon, 671 P.2d 1133, 99 Nev. 801, 1983 Nev. LEXIS 544 (Neb. 1983).

671 P.2d 1133 (Picon v. Ryon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skeen v. Valley Bank of Nevada
511 P.2d 1053 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1973)
U. S. Merchandise Mart, Inc. v. D & H Distributing Co.
279 A.2d 511 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1971)