Pico v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Pico v. Williams

11 P. 600, 2 Cal. Unrep. 671

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 2, 1886

DocketNo. 11,680

StatusPublished

This text of 11 P. 600 (Pico v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pico v. Williams, 11 P. 600, 2 Cal. Unrep. 671 (Cal. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

By the COURT.

We are of opinion that, from the facts stated in the petition, the petitioner is not entitled to a writ of prohibition. The request of the governor, as set forth in the petition, was sufficient authority for Judge Williams to hold a superior court in the county of Los Angeles. It is therefore unnecessary to consider any, issue raised by the answer of respondent.

The application for a writ of prohibition is denied, and the alternative writ heretofore issued is annulled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the COURT.

We are of opinion that, from the facts stated in the petition, the petitioner is not entitled to a writ of prohibition. The request of the governor, as set forth in the petition, was sufficient authority for Judge Williams to hold a superior court in the county of Los Angeles. It is therefore unnecessary to consider any, issue raised by the answer of respondent.

The application for a writ of prohibition is denied, and the alternative writ heretofore issued is annulled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 P. 600, 2 Cal. Unrep. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pico-v-williams-cal-1886.