Pico, Inc. v. Mickel
232 S.E.2d 841, 238 Ga. 218, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 966
This text of 232 S.E.2d 841 (Pico, Inc. v. Mickel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pico, Inc. v. Mickel, 232 S.E.2d 841, 238 Ga. 218, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 966 (Ga. 1977).
Opinion
Certiorari was granted in this case to determine whether plaintiffs judgment should be limited to one enforceable against the property described in the deed to secure debt. Respondents have conceded that the judgment should be so limited. Thus understood, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mickel v. Pickett
247 S.E.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Foster v. Economy Developers, Inc.
246 S.E.2d 366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 S.E.2d 841, 238 Ga. 218, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pico-inc-v-mickel-ga-1977.