Pico, Inc. v. Mickel
232 S.E.2d 841, 238 Ga. 218, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 966
Opinion
Certiorari was granted in this case to determine whether plaintiffs judgment should be limited to one enforceable against the property described in the deed to secure debt. Respondents have conceded that the judgment should be so limited. Thus understood, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pico, Inc. v. Mickel, 232 S.E.2d 841, 238 Ga. 218, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 966 (Ga. 1977).
232 S.E.2d 841 (Pico, Inc. v. Mickel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mickel v. Pickett
247 S.E.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
Foster v. Economy Developers, Inc.
246 S.E.2d 366 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)