Pickus v. Windsor

216 N.W. 887, 52 S.D. 158, 1927 S.D. LEXIS 310
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1927
DocketFile No. 6215
StatusPublished

This text of 216 N.W. 887 (Pickus v. Windsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickus v. Windsor, 216 N.W. 887, 52 S.D. 158, 1927 S.D. LEXIS 310 (S.D. 1927).

Opinion

POLLEY, J.

This cause is on appeal from the judgment and order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. It is stated in appellant’s brief that the motion for a new trial was submitted to the trial court upon 'specifications of particulars wherein the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, and that that is the only question they care to discuss on this appeal. But there is no assignment of error based on such specifications, nor upon any other specifications, or upon the order denying a new trial, nor any assignment whatever. This being the case, there is nothing before this court for review and the appeal must be dismissed. See Supreme Court rules 4 and 5, and cases cited pages 2 to 7, Rules of Court, 40 S. D. Also, see, Peterson v. Menke et al., just decided by this court, 216 N. W. 886.

The appeal will be dismissed.

CAMPBELL, P. J., and BURCH, SHERWOOD, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peterson v. Menke
216 N.W. 886 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 N.W. 887, 52 S.D. 158, 1927 S.D. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickus-v-windsor-sd-1927.