Pickrell v. Buckler
296 S.W. 1062, 116 Tex. 567, 1927 Tex. LEXIS 125
Opinion
We are not inclined to the view that the covenant to renew in the original lease was void for uncertainty.
We conclude, however, that under the writings executed by the parties the plaintiffs in error had no right or option to renew the lease more than the one time.
The Court of Civil Appeals having therefore entered the correct judgment, the writ of error will be refused, regardless of our failure to concur in all that is said in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pickrell v. Buckler, 296 S.W. 1062, 116 Tex. 567, 1927 Tex. LEXIS 125 (Tex. 1927).
296 S.W. 1062 (Pickrell v. Buckler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aldridge v. Young
689 S.W.2d 342 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1985)
Hull v. Quanah Pipeline Corp.
574 S.W.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Aycock v. Vantage Management Co.
554 S.W.2d 235 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Stephenson v. Chrisman
537 S.W.2d 525 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)