Pickleseimer v. Duke

154 S.E. 457, 41 Ga. App. 614, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1018
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1930·No. 20444·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the original petition, over the objection “that there was not enough in plaintiff’s original pleading to amend by.”

2. The petition as amended set out a cause of action, and was not subject to any ground of the demurrer interposed, and the court properly so ruled. ' Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur. Franlc O. Tindall, for plaintiff in error. Sutherland & Tuttle, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickleseimer v. Duke, 154 S.E. 457, 41 Ga. App. 614, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1018 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

154 S.E. 457 (Pickleseimer v. Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lenderman v. Haynie
80 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)