Pickleseimer v. Duke

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pickleseimer v. Duke

154 S.E. 457, 41 Ga. App. 614, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1018

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 15, 1930

Docket20444

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 S.E. 457 (Pickleseimer v. Duke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickleseimer v. Duke, 154 S.E. 457, 41 Ga. App. 614, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1018 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the original petition, over the objection “that there was not enough in plaintiff’s original pleading to amend by.”

2. The petition as amended set out a cause of action, and was not subject to any ground of the demurrer interposed, and the court properly so ruled. ' Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur. Franlc O. Tindall, for plaintiff in error. Sutherland & Tuttle, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The court did not err in allowing the amendment to the original petition, over the objection “that there was not enough in plaintiff’s original pleading to amend by.”

2. The petition as amended set out a cause of action, and was not subject to any ground of the demurrer interposed, and the court properly so ruled. ' Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur. Franlc O. Tindall, for plaintiff in error. Sutherland & Tuttle, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 S.E. 457, 41 Ga. App. 614, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickleseimer-v-duke-gactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack