Pickler v. County Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Pickler v. County Board of Education

62 S.E. 902, 149 N.C. 221, 1908 N.C. LEXIS 328

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 19, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by19 cases

This text of 62 S.E. 902 (Pickler v. County Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickler v. County Board of Education, 62 S.E. 902, 149 N.C. 221, 1908 N.C. LEXIS 328 (N.C. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Clare, O. J.

Rev., sec. 4129, provides that the Comity Board of Education, upon whom is placed the duty of dividing the townships into school districts, “shall establish no new school in any township within less than three miles, by the nearest traveled route, of some school already established in said township.”

The public school district of “Cherry Hill,” Davie County, . was laid off, site bought and building erected 50 or 60 years ago.' It is now nearer than three miles to another public school. The building needing repairs, an effort was made to induce the defendant Board to remove the site and búild a new school house at another point a mile away. After hearing those in favor of and those opposed to the removal, the Board decided not to change the site, and instead of repairing, to build a new school building on the old site. The plaintiffs obtained a temporary restraining order which, on affidavits filed, and, after hearing, was dissolved by Judge Long.

There was no error. The duty of dividing the townships into school districts and the erection and maintenance of school buildings is left to the judgment of the School Board. Rev., secs. 4116, 4121, 4124. There being no allegation of misconduct, their action can not be supervised nor restrained by the courts unless in violation of some provision of the statutes. Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 160. It does not appear whether the other school house, “nearer than three miles,” was erected before, or since, this was erected at Cherry Hill 50 or 60 years ago. But, at any rate, the prohibition that the Board “shall establish no new school in any township within less than three miles, by the nearest traveled route, of some school already established in said township,” cannot be construed to prohibit the Board from repairing, or building a new school house, on the site where a school has long been established.

*223 Pending the appeal the new school house has doubtless been built. If that appeared, we would not decide an abstract question. In any event the judgment dissolving the restraining order should be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clare, O. J.

Rev., sec. 4129, provides that the Comity Board of Education, upon whom is placed the duty of dividing the townships into school districts, “shall establish no new school in any township within less than three miles, by the nearest traveled route, of some school already established in said township.”

The public school district of “Cherry Hill,” Davie County, . was laid off, site bought and building erected 50 or 60 years ago.' It is now nearer than three miles to another public school. The building needing repairs, an effort was made to induce the defendant Board to remove the site and búild a new school house at another point a mile away. After hearing those in favor of and those opposed to the removal, the Board decided not to change the site, and instead of repairing, to build a new school building on the old site. The plaintiffs obtained a temporary restraining order which, on affidavits filed, and, after hearing, was dissolved by Judge Long.

There was no error. The duty of dividing the townships into school districts and the erection and maintenance of school buildings is left to the judgment of the School Board. Rev., secs. 4116, 4121, 4124. There being no allegation of misconduct, their action can not be supervised nor restrained by the courts unless in violation of some provision of the statutes. Smith v. School Trustees, 141 N. C., 160. It does not appear whether the other school house, “nearer than three miles,” was erected before, or since, this was erected at Cherry Hill 50 or 60 years ago. But, at any rate, the prohibition that the Board “shall establish no new school in any township within less than three miles, by the nearest traveled route, of some school already established in said township,” cannot be construed to prohibit the Board from repairing, or building a new school house, on the site where a school has long been established.

*223 Pending the appeal the new school house has doubtless been built. If that appeared, we would not decide an abstract question. In any event the judgment dissolving the restraining order should be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 S.E. 902, 149 N.C. 221, 1908 N.C. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickler-v-county-board-of-education-nc-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack