Pickle v. Puckett
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60566 USDC No. 4:96-CV-347-S-A
C.D. PICKLE, JR.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
STEVE PUCKETT, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary; ED HARGETT, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary; JAMES ANDERSON, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary; ANN LEE,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi --------------------
July 14, 1999
Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
C. D. Pickle, Jr. (“Pickle”), Mississippi prisoner # 31459,
appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A) requires
that the notice of appeal be filed within 30 days of the entry of
a final judgment in a civil action. A timely notice of appeal is
a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by this court.
United States v. Carr, 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992); United
States v. Merrifield, 764 F.2d 436, 437 (5th Cir. 1985).
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-60566 -2-
Pickle’s notice of appeal was not timely filed within 30
days of the entry of the district court’s final judgment. The
last day for filing a timely notice of appeal was August 14,
1998. Pickle could have delivered his notice of appeal to prison
officials no earlier than August 19, 1998. Therefore, Pickle’s
appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and his accompanying
motion to compel discovery is DENIED AS MOOT.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY DENIED AS MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pickle v. Puckett (Pickle v. Puckett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.