Pickle v. Holland

24 Miss. 566
Court of Appeals of Mississippi·Decided October 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fisher

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a bill filed on the chancery side of the circuit court of Lauderdale county. The record shows that the injunction [567] was dissolved on the motion of complainant, from which order a writ of error has been prosecuted to this court.

The order dissolving the injunction does not dismiss the bill, and it is, therefore, merely an interlocutory, order, from which a writ of error cannot be prosecuted. A writ of error can only be prosecuted to a final decree or judgment. The statute allows an appeal from certain interlocutory orders in chancery; and it is only by appeal that a cause' in such cases can be brought into this court.

Motion to dismiss the writ .of error sustained, and judgment against the plaintiff in error-for costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickle v. Holland, 24 Miss. 566 (Mich. Ct. App. 1852).

24 Miss. 566 (Pickle v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bullen v. Smith
111 So. 454 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Vicksburg Water Works Co. v. Mayor of Vicksburg
54 So. 852 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)