Pickle v. Holland

24 Miss. 566
CourtCourt of Appeals of Mississippi
DecidedOctober 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 Miss. 566 (Pickle v. Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickle v. Holland, 24 Miss. 566 (Mich. Ct. App. 1852).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fisher

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a bill filed on the chancery side of the circuit court of Lauderdale county. The record shows that the injunction [567]*567was dissolved on the motion of complainant, from which order a writ of error has been prosecuted to this court.

The order dissolving the injunction does not dismiss the bill, and it is, therefore, merely an interlocutory, order, from which a writ of error cannot be prosecuted. A writ of error can only be prosecuted to a final decree or judgment. The statute allows an appeal from certain interlocutory orders in chancery; and it is only by appeal that a cause' in such cases can be brought into this court.

Motion to dismiss the writ .of error sustained, and judgment against the plaintiff in error-for costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bullen v. Smith
111 So. 454 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1927)
Vicksburg Water Works Co. v. Mayor of Vicksburg
54 So. 852 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Miss. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickle-v-holland-missctapp-1852.