Pickle v. Byers

16 Ind. 383, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 202
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 12, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 Ind. 383 (Pickle v. Byers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickle v. Byers, 16 Ind. 383, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 202 (Ind. 1861).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit against two, for a tort committed jointly. Several judgments for damages. This was error. Ind. Pr., p. 144. This case differs from Johnson v. Vutrick, 14 Ind. 216, in this: that here, the trial was a joint one, a single verdict, and the Court trying the cause had the whole matter before it. No plea, or motion, was required to bring before the Court any former judgment. See 2 Hilliard on Torts, p. 464, et seg.; 1 Archb. Pr. 218, 219; 6 T. Rep. 199, 200; 1 Wilson, 30, and 306.

The judgment is reversed, back to the issue, with costs. Cause remanded for a new trial, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Ebert
138 So. 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Castle v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.
16 Haw. 33 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1904)
Munroe v. Carlisle
57 N.E. 332 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Ind. 383, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickle-v-byers-ind-1861.