Pickett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2500

EDNA M. PICKETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED; JULIE GOEMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-96-952-5-F)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edna M. Pickett, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Stephen Muzingo, WALMART STORES, INCORPORATED - LEGAL TEAM, Bentonville, Arizona, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the De-

fendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing this Title VII

action alleging racial discrimination. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (1994). We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e- 5(e)(1); see generally Greene v. Whirlpool Corp., 708 F.2d 128, 130

(4th Cir. 1983). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED