Pickett v. State
This text of 191 S.E. 136 (Pickett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credible, was sufficient to support the verdict. The jury being the judges of the weight of the evidence, this court can not disturb the judgment" on the ground that the lower court abused its discretion in denying a new trial on the general grounds of the motion.
2. The exception to the excerpt from the charge to the jury is not meritorious. The judgment overruling the motion for new trial is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 S.E. 136, 55 Ga. App. 682, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-v-state-gactapp-1937.