Pickett v. State

322 So. 2d 642, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18843
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1975·No. No. 75-1218·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the special assistant public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished the appellant with a copy of the [643]*643special assistant public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the special assistant public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pickett v. State, 322 So. 2d 642, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18843 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

322 So. 2d 642 (Pickett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)