Pickett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Pickett v. State

802 So. 2d 1106, 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 32, 2001 WL 220187

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 2, 2001

DocketCR-99-2068

StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 1106 (Pickett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickett v. State, 802 So. 2d 1106, 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 32, 2001 WL 220187 (Ala. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Retired Appellate Judge.

Wallace Pickett appeals from his convictions for first-degree criminal mischief and harassment, for which he was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment and six months’ imprisonment, respectively. The sentences were to be served concurrently. These convictions were entered pursuant to his pleas of guilty. His appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which he asserts that, after reviewing the record and conferring with trial counsel, he can find no legitimate issue to present on appeal.

After examining the record, we find only one issue requiring any action: Pickett’s six-month sentence for the offense of harassment, a Class C misdemeanor, § 13A-ll-8(a)(l), exceeds the statutory maximum of three months’ incarceration set by § 13A-5-7(a)(3). “ ‘When the court imposes sentence in excess of that authorized by statute, it exceeds its jurisdiction, and the sentence is consequently void.’ ” King v. State, 677 So.2d 836, 838 (Ala.Crim.App.1996) (quoting Ferguson v. State, 565 So.2d 1172, 1173 (Ala.Crim.App.1990)). This error requires that we remand this case for the trial court to vacate Pickett’s sentence for his conviction of harassment and to resentence within the statutory limits.

The trial court shall take all necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time within 28 days of the release of this opinion. The return to remand shall include a transcript of the sentencing proceedings conducted by the court.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge John Patterson while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Ala.Code 1975.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Retired Appellate Judge.

Wallace Pickett appeals from his convictions for first-degree criminal mischief and harassment, for which he was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment and six months’ imprisonment, respectively. The sentences were to be served concurrently. These convictions were entered pursuant to his pleas of guilty. His appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), in which he asserts that, after reviewing the record and conferring with trial counsel, he can find no legitimate issue to present on appeal.

After examining the record, we find only one issue requiring any action: Pickett’s six-month sentence for the offense of harassment, a Class C misdemeanor, § 13A-ll-8(a)(l), exceeds the statutory maximum of three months’ incarceration set by § 13A-5-7(a)(3). “ ‘When the court imposes sentence in excess of that authorized by statute, it exceeds its jurisdiction, and the sentence is consequently void.’ ” King v. State, 677 So.2d 836, 838 (Ala.Crim.App.1996) (quoting Ferguson v. State, 565 So.2d 1172, 1173 (Ala.Crim.App.1990)). This error requires that we remand this case for the trial court to vacate Pickett’s sentence for his conviction of harassment and to resentence within the statutory limits.

The trial court shall take all necessary action to see that the circuit clerk makes due return to this court at the earliest possible time within 28 days of the release of this opinion. The return to remand shall include a transcript of the sentencing proceedings conducted by the court.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Appellate Judge John Patterson while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e), Ala.Code 1975.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 So. 2d 1106, 2001 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 32, 2001 WL 220187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-v-state-alacrimapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack