Pickett v. Probuilt Construction Co.

488 So. 2d 158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1119, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1986
DocketNo. BH-108
StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 158 (Pickett v. Probuilt Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pickett v. Probuilt Construction Co., 488 So. 2d 158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1119, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the deputy commissioner erred in sustaining the employer/carrier’s [159]*159objection to the proffered testimony of Dr. Bodden. However, we find the evidence, even considering the proffered testimony, insufficient to sustain an award of TTD benefits, and therefore AFFIRM the deputy commissioner’s order.

NIMMONS, ZEHMER and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 158, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1119, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-v-probuilt-construction-co-fladistctapp-1986.