Pickett v. Montgomery Police Department

D.C. Circuit

Pickett v. Montgomery Police Department

35 F. App'x 3

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2002

DocketNo. 00-7187

StatusPublished

This text of 35 F. App'x 3 (Pickett v. Montgomery Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pickett v. Montgomery Police Department, 35 F. App'x 3 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[4]*4 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment filed October 30, 2001, be affirmed. The court correctly held that appellant failed to state the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction and the nature of the relief sought, as required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[4]*4 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment filed October 30, 2001, be affirmed. The court correctly held that appellant failed to state the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction and the nature of the relief sought, as required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 F. App'x 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-v-montgomery-police-department-cadc-2002.