Pickett v. Gollner

New York City Court

Pickett v. Gollner

7 N.Y.S. 196, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 691, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1005

New York City Court·Decided October 28, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Van Wyck, J.

In our opinion the language of this mechanic’s lien statute (Laws 1885, c. 342, § 1) is broad enough to include a claim for terracing [197] and sodding the yard of a building lot. Moran v. Chase, 52 N. Y. 346; Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 549. The form of the judgment is substantially correct. Lawson v. Reilly, 13 Civ. Proc. R. 290. The other questions raised by appellant have been disposed of adversely to him by the court of appeals in Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 539. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Wyck, J.

In our opinion the language of this mechanic’s lien statute (Laws 1885, c. 342, § 1) is broad enough to include a claim for terracing [197] and sodding the yard of a building lot. Moran v. Chase, 52 N. Y. 346; Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 549. The form of the judgment is substantially correct. Lawson v. Reilly, 13 Civ. Proc. R. 290. The other questions raised by appellant have been disposed of adversely to him by the court of appeals in Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 539. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Pickett v. Gollner, 7 N.Y.S. 196, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 691, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1005 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

7 N.Y.S. 196 (Pickett v. Gollner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related