Pickett v. Gollner
This text of 7 N.Y.S. 196 (Pickett v. Gollner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In our opinion the language of this mechanic’s lien statute (Laws 1885, c. 342, § 1) is broad enough to include a claim for terracing [197]*197and sodding the yard of a building lot. Moran v. Chase, 52 N. Y. 346; Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 549. The form of the judgment is substantially correct. Lawson v. Reilly, 13 Civ. Proc. R. 290. The other questions raised by appellant have been disposed of adversely to him by the court of appeals in Kenney v. Apgar, 93 N. Y. 539. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 N.Y.S. 196, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 691, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pickett-v-gollner-nycityct-1889.