Pickett v. Collier

• Court: Superior Court of Delaware
• Decided: March 26, 2025
• Docket: N24C-09-263 CLS
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHAWN PICKETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N24C-09-263 CLS RANDY COLLIER, SIMPLY GREEN, ) ) Defendants. )

Submitted: February 19, 2025 Decided: March 26, 2025

ORDER

This 25th day of March 2025, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for

Reconsideration (“the Motion”);1

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Motion is DENIED for the following

reasons:

The Motion is denied as untimely. The Motion was filed more than five (5)

days after the filing of the Court’s decision.2

1 D.I. 18. 2 “A motion for reargument shall be served and filed within 5 days after the filing of the Court's opinion or decision.” Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e).

1 Further, Plaintiff does not identify any controlling precedent or legal principle

that this Court overlooked, nor does he demonstrate the Court misapprehended the

law or facts in a way that would affect the outcome of its decision.3

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Calvin Scott Calvin L. Scott, Jr. Judge

3 Cummings v. Jimmy’s Grille, Inc., 2000 WL 1211167, at *2 (Del. Super. Aug. 9, 2000).